Simon Pieters
Simon Pieters
It's not for CSS but for future descriptors like integrity(). The algorithm is intentionally "simple" and CSS compat is not a goal.
It probably depends on the screen reader, but I'm under the impression that they typically don't do much to indicate what is what in a `dl`, so it reads like...
As for the audience, this construct is used more widely than WHATWG specs. The case that @mcking65 found annoying to read with a screen reader was https://w3c.github.io/aria-practices/#name_calculation (which I wrote),...
Stray feedback about the current UI - It is non-obvious that you're supposed to click commits. - There is no indication that the "reviewed" checkboxes do anything.
Yeah, the check for modifications is nice but shouldn't block me from starting the write my comment. For the closing, I'm thinking the dialog could be "minimized" and moved to...
Oh, OK. Any -> any doesn't appear to work so well for https://critic.hoppipolla.co.uk/r/420 . I guess git doesn't give critic information about which files were moved?
Radio buttons also use `checked`
@jakearchibald can you rebase this to rerun the bots?
The lint is failing due to trailing whitespace.
> Does this belong in the Widgets section, or the Replaced elements section? Both seem rather similar. Neither? Can't it stay in the phrasing content section? > Did I use...