Zachary Dunn

> by default they will be in the "Local" tab, and they can then click "All" to see all communities with the same name. @Visne communities having the same name...

@Kealper @markcellus My idea was that you would only need to subscribe to one community in a community group and then you would receive all posts posted to any community...

@markcellus I think the post link works fine. Right now when you try to create a new post with a link, your instance will tell you if there are any...

@jazir5 so if you subscribe to [email protected] and its in a group with [email protected] and [email protected], you would want a toggle so you could switch between just posts from [email protected]...

@gsisko That's not a re-framing, that's exactly what I'm proposing. A community in a community group would show posts from other communities in the community group. > They would be...

> In a perfect world we merge and users easily find the merged one. @csm10495 That is what this proposal would solve. If you grouped your community (I'll call it...

> So we would invest a lot of work for a, admittably nice, feature that will be of limited use because no one else is implementing it Limited use is...

> We would need another table which stores the relation between a post and magazines. Is that how you handle microblog posts? When a user boosts a microblog post, does...

@e-five256 > What I'm not getting is whether an inbox activity from a Group is then meant to be emitted to any followers that are also of type Group. I...

> so that you always see the posts of both groups, when looking at either one of them Yes! This is exactly what I intended. You may be browsing `[email protected]`...