Izaak "Zaak" Beekman

Moved Damian's comment on old closed thread here: > On July 21, 2017 at 2:56:17 PM, zbeekman ([email protected]) wrote: > > I have never met anyone who told me they...

@cmacmackin FORD is an _incredibly useful and powerful_ tool. Using it as a library, or extracting logic from it could be a great way to bootstrap a linter/style audit tool.

> However, I think @zbeekman is too futuristic: we have just started to discuss :smile: @szaghi yes I know this is a far out, pie in the sky proposal, but...

> Should we then, following the no-dead-code principle, mandate that you should never use a default statement if you are really sure the code will take one of the earlier...

Another case, worth considering, is if one writes generic procedures, and then Fortran `include`s them into a module. In that case I would argue that `implicit none` is required for...

But then the standard can't just refer to a generic "processor" (room full of monkeys with typewriters?) :rofl:

:+1:

I just want to circle back to the original intent of this thread: What license should _this_ document (i.e., Fortran-FOSS-Programmers/Best_Practices) be licensed under. If people want to discuss best-practices and...

For _this document_ my preference is `CC-by` or `CC-by-sa`. Using the copyleft share alike license will help discourage other document supersedes this one in adoption and popularity by making sure...

@szaghi I think your table summary above is wrong. The subject of this thread is to vote on what license to use for __THIS__ repository. Your summary table is a...