Zanie Blue

Will `prefect flow-run logs ` suffice? Is this a UI or CLI request? Your logs are already accessible via the API.

We've explored this in the past but do not have a clear path forward, see existing issue at https://github.com/PrefectHQ/server/issues/213 and drafted implementation at https://github.com/PrefectHQ/prefect/pull/4532 It's not likely that we will...

I believe we'll want to implement this as a `prefect block delete ` command but I have no clue what our plans are for a blocks CLI

I'm not up to date on all of this thread, but the next release will support only storing a reference to the flow's import path in the Prefect database which...

> Does that functionality work with the new Deployment paradigm, or did that only work for packaging flows via manifests during beta? Not yet. We'll be investigating ways to reincorporate...

I think we should clarify the documentation here or improve this state handler to meet expectations (or both).

Hey @peterroelants, thanks for the thorough report. This is a bit tricky; the serialized `Result` type in the backend does not include the `serializer` attribute so when you retrieve your...

> I see, so if I understand correctly the state.load_result method calls PrefectResult.read. However, since the flow run (and its state and results) are fetched via client.get_flow_run_info, the result serializer...

Hi, have you tried providing a volume path instead of `''`? Are you unable to change the permissions on the directory? It's worth noting that directory is inside the container...

It looks like you need to change the permissions on the directory as described by the error: `Permissions should be u=rwx (0700) or u=rwx,g=rx (0750)`