Zanie Blue

> We haven't received any user reports yet that they find our current CLI behaviour bad. I would be inclined to keep it as-is until we receive any complaints I'm...

@carljm suggests > the two things we might need are > 1) support for type context on arguments to implicit dunder calls > 2) support for a bounded type variable...

Please someone save me from these horrendous GitHub Actions behaviors.

Doesn't look runner version related? Failed run ``` Current runner version: '2.320.0' Operating System Ubuntu 22.04.5 LTS Runner Image Image: ubuntu-22.04 Version: 20241015.1.0 Included Software: https://github.com/actions/runner-images/blob/ubuntu22/20241015.1/images/ubuntu/Ubuntu2204-Readme.md Image Release: https://github.com/actions/runner-images/releases/tag/ubuntu22%2F20241015.1 ```...

Yeah idk what the guidance is? Reinstall?

I'm interested in waiting to see how someone would get in this situation, but agree guidance would be nice.

It seems a little different with extras, my understand is that behavior exists to avoid breaking your project when a dependency version changes and the available extras change and we...

No you can't reference dependency groups from the `[project]` table. This was initially proposed in PEP 735 but was removed. You can see context about that [in the PEP](https://peps.python.org/pep-0735/#why-not-support-dependency-group-includes-in-project-dependencies-or-project-optional-dependencies) and...

We're engaging in the discussion over at https://github.com/pypa/pip/issues/12963 — you can track that for upstream support.

Perhaps if we dim these we should sort them _after_ the installed versions?