Zanie Blue
Zanie Blue
Makes sense, though I'm not sure how straight-forward it would be to add. A `--timings` flag seems reasonable?
Minor note, this is included as `--bundle-python` in @konstin's document about features we should add for Docker.
Hi! Thanks for the clear description of what you're looking for. It is specifically _not_ recommended to pin a single Python version in the `requires-python` field — it's against the...
Now that we have an application / library split I wonder if we can use that to determine if we should add upper bounds by default. Previously, we were quite...
I'm not opposed to adding an option, I think. We'll need to reach consensus as a team though. cc @konstin
Down to 10m from 25m.
It's not on the roadmap, no. Defining sources outside the `pyproject.toml` would invalidate the lockfile. We'd rather invest in things like being able to toggle sources based on the presence...
That's fair, but allowing it in that context but not other ones adds a bunch of complexity! If we choose to do so, we'll need to be careful about it.
Thanks for the report! Technically, I think it's a violation of the specification to exclude the `name` field when a `[project]` table exists. From the relevant [document](https://packaging.python.org/en/latest/specifications/pyproject-toml/#declaring-project-metadata-the-project-table): > The lack...
I'm also reading a bit into the linked issue regarding the implicit table definition — please let me know if you think it's wrong to fail if `name` is missing...