Aleksei Zinovev

I'll do the review this week and comment the proposed draft

@ileasile could you give us advice, looks like the auto-importing is supported when the library definition is added, isn't it?

So @dosier if you have any questions, ask me. I tried to comment on the existing solution and answer a few questions (and made more:) Great to find any existing...

Please, add the attachment @gasabr. Could you try to repeat the experiment with the latest version of the onnx-dependency, here ``` implementation("org.jetbrains.kotlinx:kotlin-deeplearning-api:0.3.0") implementation("org.jetbrains.kotlinx:kotlin-deeplearning-onnx:0.3.0") ```

Thanks, @gasabr thanks, for the example you gave me, and I hope to fix it in the 0.4 release to cover more cases, but at this moment java onnxruntime is...

@jbaron Thanks for the feedback. I totally agree with you. The dataset API is minimal. You shared a few tips and ideas; it could be the initial point for the...

The current status of TC: 1. Internal JetBrains TC: api-test, example-test, maven-publication, build artifacts 2. Trigger on each commit to the master branch Plans: 1. Run tests/examples on proposed PRs...

I discussed your issue with the team and we made the following solution for this moment _**Plans: Run tests/examples on proposed PRs + Make integration with a simple OK from...

At this moment the trigger on PRs commits or access for the users outside JetBrains org is prohibited due to security reasons (it's easy to make DDOS on our TC...

Great, @avan1235 I'll try your approach. So, I know the reason for this test failing. It's a flaky test due to some asserts are not true sometimes due to TensorFlow...