Ivan Yonchovski

> I mean for the prescriptive version you would be able to put the plist into some variable, and changing that variable would then change the behavior it represents. So...

> It's no plist, but it will give you a lot more introspective power. You write this: Can you elaborate what is the idea behind having a definition for each...

Sorry, I somehow missed the previous reply. I think that your screenshot is close to what I am looking for. > > I am interested in support of open/expanded/no-children state...

(off topic) WDYT about adding the ability to show things at the end of the line. It could be used as an alternative to the git statuses represented as different...

> Why not just concat the prefix with the actual icon? This is what we do but it goes in the lsp-treemacs in render method instead of having each extension...

> Adding a different icon to indicate an empty state is a good idea. prefixing with ▾ ▸ help indicating that. Otherwise, you don't know if it can be expanded...

> @yyoncho As promised I've pushed a prototype to the `treelib` branch now. > > There's a set of working examples in Extensions.org that you can load with `org-babel-load-file`. Thank...

@yyoncho yes, I will try to go through the code during the weekend.

I am getting (It might be my fault). ``` Debugger entered--Lisp error: (wrong-number-of-arguments ((t) (btn item) (ignore btn item) (-distinct (mapcar #'(lambda (it) (ignore it) (buffer-local-value 'major-mode it)) (let (result)...

> To some degree. I tried to avoid this, however there have been some internal changes that probably prevent the old and the new extensions from running at the same...