vimer

add support for riscv64

4

Hi, I am porting the package to riscv64 arch on Debian, the build is ok and it pass its test suite from my local build log. The patch is here:...

Hi, I am packaging this package to Debian. But now I get one lintian info as follows: ``` I: liblinenoise-ocaml-dev: unstripped-static-library (lNoise.o) [usr/lib/ocaml/linenoise/linenoise.a] ``` This is not a real issue...

Hi, I noticed the openmsx that has support riscv64 arch, but it seems the openmsx-debugger does not support riscv64. The patch I sent for Debian openmsx-debugger apply here maybe also:...

help to package to Debian

4

Hi, I am packaging the package on Debian. But I found the latest tag was almost [4](https://github.com/ptitSeb/gl4es/releases/tag/v1.1.4) years ago. But the important is that we have to remove the `debian/`...

aseba was built failed on gcc-13: ``` //aseba/common/msg/TargetDescription.h:88:17: error: ‘uint16_t’ does not name a type | 88 | uint16_t crc() const; | | ^~~~~~~~ | //aseba/common/msg/TargetDescription.h:26:1: note: ‘uint16_t’ is defined...

vector complex test failed on riscv64

6

**Describe the issue or bug** I noticed some test cases failed on riscv64: ``` =========================== short test summary info ============================ FAILED rpy2/tests/rinterface/test_na.py::test_R_to_NAComplex - assert False FAILED rpy2/tests/rinterface/test_vector_complex.py::test_init_from_seqr - as... FAILED...

Hi, From Debian build [log](https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1073374), we got: ``` ... > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "//interface/tests/python/./check_levelset.py", line 30, in > from scipy import rand > ImportError: cannot import...

Add riscv64 build support

3

## Steps to reproduce I am trying to build eclipse on riscv64, but unfortunately it failed. I have posted this on [eclipse-dev](https://www.eclipse.org/lists/eclipse-dev/msg12286.html) mail list. ## Here is some relevant log...

test run again with ocamlformat 0.16.0?

9

Hi, I was packaging the[ bisect-ppx](https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/bisect-ppx) into Debian. But now the [ocamlformat](https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/ocamlformat) was just uploaded there also some days ago, Unfortunately there is only 0.26.2 since. So it seems there...

missing hardening flags on Debian building

1

hi, when I was packaging the new upstream release(1.0.1), I got one [blhc ](https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/opentsne/-/pipelines/704350)test failed: ``` vimer@dev:~/build/rfs/python/ftbfs/opentsne$ blhc ../build-area/opentsne_1.0.1-1_amd64.build CFLAGS missing (-g -O2 -fstack-protector-strong -fstack-clash-protection -Wformat -Werror=format-security -fcf-protection): x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc /tmp6x6svb_h/omp.o...