Yu Watanabe

> > I think the PR is fine, but we can't merge it now or in the near future. > > At least that was made abundantly clear by the...

@bluca and @mrc0mmand Is it possible to enable bullseye-backports repository for Semaphore CI??

> > @bluca and @mrc0mmand Is it possible to enable bullseye-backports repository for Semaphore CI?? > > Sure, for what purpose? What do you need from it? As I said...

``` ../src/boot/efi/util.c: In function ‘log_wait’: /home/runner/work/systemd/systemd/src/fundamental/macro-fundamental.h:170:31: error: comparison of integer expressions of different signedness: ‘unsigned int’ and ‘int’ [-Werror=sign-compare] 170 | UNIQ_T(A, aq) < UNIQ_T(B, bq) ? UNIQ_T(A, aq) :...

semaphoreci ``` ../src/boot/efi/efi-string.c: In function ‘format_status’: 01:14 ../src/boot/efi/efi-string.c:367:14: error: ‘EFI_WARN_UNKNOWN_GLYPH’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘EFI_WARN_UNKOWN_GLYPH’? 01:14 367 | case EFI_WARN_UNKNOWN_GLYPH: s = u"Unknown glyph"; break;...

> Just FYI, github sends out notifications for CI failures on its own. OK. Sorry for the noise.

needs to be rebased. BTW, As I commented few weeks (months?) ago, this should be definitely tested with a fuzzer, though I do not block this PR without it, and...

BTW, is this for RFE #17625? If so, please add `Closes #17625.` in the commit message. Also, please drop signed-off-by tag in the commit message. We do not use it.

> In terms of implementation, apparently there can be multiple device > trees at once. I have decided to dodge this problem for now, and just > use /proc/device-tree. If...

Interesting. If my check is correct, we have not changed anything related to this issue. Did kernel fix this issue? @snowsnoot If possible, could you test with older kernels?