Ron

> _However_, if my thinking is correct, it won't actually reduce costs if the relayer is caught up, and users are actively sending messages to Ethereum, because, we still need...

@vgeddes In https://github.com/Snowfork/snowbridge/pull/1155/commits/0b3344cb9e35e6df5ad9c745fd24ef1559635aab I made the change to reuse `IGateway.sendToken` for polkadot native asset. But I'd still prefer to separate as different message types internally(rename as [SendForeignToken](https://github.com/Snowfork/snowbridge/pull/1155/commits/e53afd081b74a1ea820f695d5aac6acdf2376f8e)). The two branches...

Add 3 smoke tests to cover the basic flow ``` cargo test --test register_polkadot_token // register relay token(i.e. ROC|KSM|DOT) on Ethereum cargo test --test transfer_polkadot_token // transfer relay token from...

> Is it necessary for this PR to be making heavy modifications to our lower-level protocol? (ie, Gateway.sol and AgentExecutor.sol) Yes. The underlying logic/mechanism for transferring Ethereum native tokens(e.g. WETH)...

Could we start with the teleport pattern as before which will make things a bit easier? Or by no means that third party chain will accept that? I'm not sure...

@vgeddes To not use teleport for transact in https://github.com/Snowfork/polkadot-sdk/pull/114/commits/51b76fe5271e67337a15da4c0b097822f8580f12

@alistair-singh As Vincent mentioned teleportation is strictly not allowed here so I've removed that in recent commits

One caveat for Parachain to integrate is that since the fee is paid upfront on Ethereum and `UnpaidExecution` is sent to the dest chain, the risk potentially is a malicious...

> Does this PR still work this way? Nope. Sorry for the confusion, I should have removed it earlier.

@serban300 Thanks for checking the issue. Just input the block number 25744485, and leave the others None. Then use the generated output for the verification. Btw, we use a simplified...