Yurii Rashkovskii
Yurii Rashkovskii
Thanks! Looks like it is missing an update to the `option_name` function: https://github.com/zeromq/erlzmq2/blob/master/src/erlzmq.erl#L434-L477
I apologize, I totally forgot about this pull request. Hopefully will have a chance to go through it soon!
Hey, I want to merge this in, however I am not sure I am ready to include cdf44080 and especially c0587bb. Would you mind if I merge without them?
Or at least I'd suggest handling them separately.
I think I forgot about this. Right now there are way too many merges to merge this in.
@gar1t any chance you can extract smaller bits of it and lets go one by one? Also, wrt to rcvmore 0/1 vs false/true. I think this is a good change,...
One of the reasons why it is called `erlzmq` is to avoid confusion with the first version of the erlang binding (https://github.com/zeromq/erlzmq) since it used `zmq` module naming and its...
Initially it was called `ezmq` so it was just one extra character, but when it graduated to become the next official binding, there was a decision made to call it...
I think that there should just be a better explanation of differences between erlzmq and erlzmq2. erlzmq, even though it is seriously slower than erlzmq2, has its own uses. For...
Thanks, will look into this. Can't tell what's wrong right now.