Jeong, YunWon
Jeong, YunWon
@sum12 you are right. that's the right way. But instead of the right way, you can implement it by calling `__aiter__` directly. If you are interested in the right way,...
Since `stdio` fits better than `no-stdio` by common Rust convention, leaving a comment about the decision will be better. @coolreader18 will you suggest the comment to add?
@coolreader18 could you follow this up? I am not good at windows dev
I can't reproduce it
@coolreader18 I like this patch so much even without parallel parts. Could you split this PR to 2 chunks one for refactoring and the other one for parallel compilation?
now we use syn2. will this patch be revived?
The change looks good, but function type seems not allowing to do it. Could you please also add this error handling? ``` ====================================================================== FAIL: test_delete___dict__ (test.test_funcattrs.FunctionDictsTest.test_delete___dict__) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Traceback (most recent...
Thank you for analysis. That's a good point. Yes, making them as its own getset totally makes sense. And yes, in separated PR would be better.
@nielsbuwen Making a PR of that changes will be helpful for me to understand what's happening. My first guess is `execute_make_function` in `frame.rs`
@darleybarreto Hi, thank you for the comment. I am not planning for working on ctypes at the moment, but looking for a way to merge it as it is for...