MAME4iOS icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
MAME4iOS copied to clipboard

Do you have any plans to release the MAME emulator on the App Store?

Open Alex92908 opened this issue 10 months ago • 16 comments

@yoshisuga Nowadays, emulator apps are allowed to release on the App Store, like iGBA, are you going to release this App on the App Store?

Alex92908 avatar Apr 18 '24 14:04 Alex92908

Yes! In fact I submitted it for review and got a rejection notice. We’re trying to resolve this now and hopefully will have an update soon.

On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 11:19 PM Alex @.***> wrote:

@yoshisuga https://github.com/yoshisuga Nowadays, emulator apps are allowed to release on the App Store, like iGBA, are you going to release this App on the App Store?

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/yoshisuga/MAME4iOS/issues/457, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAEJ4JU4K3NW6HUXWC32A23Y57JA7AVCNFSM6AAAAABGNMDH2OVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43ASLTON2WKOZSGI2TAOBSGQZDCMQ . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>

yoshisuga avatar Apr 20 '24 02:04 yoshisuga

Well done, looking forward to hearing good news from you soon~

Alex92908 avatar Apr 20 '24 08:04 Alex92908

This is a fantastic news, thanks a lot yoshisuga!!! Lookin forward to see Mame4ios on the Apple Store!

Dai-Makaimura avatar Apr 21 '24 13:04 Dai-Makaimura

If it's not a problem to share, what was the reason for the rejection?

eduo avatar Apr 22 '24 14:04 eduo

Blah Blah runs downloaded or generated code. My guess is that MAME DRC does a WRX probe, even tho it is disabled. So I took that out and gonna try again.

Apps should be self-contained in their bundles, and may not read or write data outside the designated container area, nor may they download, install, or execute code which introduces or changes features or functionality of the app, including other apps. 

ToddLa avatar Apr 22 '24 17:04 ToddLa

Godspeed guys! 🫶

ultratiem avatar Apr 23 '24 18:04 ultratiem

Just another update: we got rejected because of "spam", where they think we submitted code similar to others who may have submitted MAME.

I sent a reply to App Store review saying that MAME is open source and this is the canonical port for iOS and that I'm the owner of the repository. Hopefully it will be resolved soon.

yoshisuga avatar Apr 23 '24 23:04 yoshisuga

Apple removed 'iGBA' 'coz they were copying someone else's work! Testut Tech is real owner of Delta, and currently, Delta is No:1 downloaded app US Canada... I think you have to prove that you own this project. Thank you @yoshisuga for considering this request.

RussellKR avatar Apr 24 '24 03:04 RussellKR

Thanks for the update Yoshi. You may also want to reach out to 9to5 Mac, AppleInsider and MacRumors with the news. They will surely cover your story and give you a lot of credibility that you are the owner and the app is legitimate.

Apple also monitors those sites so it may also grease the wheels.

ultratiem avatar Apr 25 '24 01:04 ultratiem

Apple removed 'iGBA' 'coz they were copying someone else's work! Testut Tech is real owner of Delta, and currently, Delta is No:1 downloaded app US Canada... I think you have to prove that you own this project. Thank you @yoshisuga for considering this request.

It's all more complicated than this. "MAME" is not the same as "MAME4iOS". Both "MAME4iOS" and "iGBA" have their source openly available so people will try to publish it themselves.

If the licenses don't allow it then Apple might pull it out or respect the repository's owner to have preference, but it's not as straightforward.

And if the person is posting a MAME port (not MAME4iOS) when it's 100% allowed, because that part is owned by the MAME team and has its own license.

In the long run all these issues will be resolved but at the beginning it's like a gold rush where both well-intentioned people and opportunists will try to be the first. Especially given the success of Delta.

eduo avatar Apr 25 '24 09:04 eduo

Thanks for the update Yoshi. You may also want to reach out to 9to5 Mac, AppleInsider and MacRumors with the news. They will surely cover your story and give you a lot of credibility that you are the owner and the app is legitimate.

Apple also monitors those sites so it may also grease the wheels.

That's an appealing idea but I'd like to hold off on notifying media sites about this and try to resolve this through App Store review to get more information, but thanks for suggesting this.

yoshisuga avatar Apr 25 '24 12:04 yoshisuga

Hope to see you in AppStore soon

DNC-7 avatar Apr 27 '24 01:04 DNC-7

Last year I tried to compile the original code and installed it on the iPhone 5s with iOS 12. It works perfect! Hope to see MAME4iOS in App Store in the near future.

benjenq avatar May 06 '24 02:05 benjenq

Oh crikey, so looking forward to this 👍

steverae68 avatar May 24 '24 22:05 steverae68

Could anyone please provide an update on this? Thanks

stagelevel avatar Jul 01 '24 21:07 stagelevel

Thanks for the update Yoshi. You may also want to reach out to 9to5 Mac, AppleInsider and MacRumors with the news. They will surely cover your story and give you a lot of credibility that you are the owner and the app is legitimate. Apple also monitors those sites so it may also grease the wheels.

That's an appealing idea but I'd like to hold off on notifying media sites about this and try to resolve this through App Store review to get more information, but thanks for suggesting this.

Were you ever given any updates on this? I see people recycling messages from April because there's no new information.

Was it possible to appeal to Apple the "spam" moniker? How hard is is even to make them listed to an explanation of it being a false positive?

eduo avatar Aug 06 '24 20:08 eduo