Yi Zhang

BTW, since my dimm nmem0's security feature was enabled:unlocked and no key now, do you know how to disable the security w/o key.

Yes, I already called that cmd. ``` # ndctl wait-overwrite nmem0 # ndctl wait-overwrite nmem4 # ndctl list -Di [ { "dev":"nmem1", "id":"8089-a2-1833-00000510", "handle":257, "phys_id":32, "flag_failed_map":true, "security":"disabled" }, { "dev":"nmem3",...

> Looking at the DSM 1.8 spec, I'm starting to get the feeling that overwrite does not change the security state of being enabled. And that when I implemented overwrite,...

> If your BIOS has the feature: Boot to the UEFI menu and enable Secure Erase Unit for the module(s) > > 1. UEFI EDKII > Socket Configuration > Memory...

> Can you open up an IPS case so Intel can track it? We can look into how to get that DIMM serviced. I've asked our HW team to do...

> I don't understand this issue. You're using an unknown option, and fio helpfully tries to tell you that you probably meant `--enghelp`. > > ?? Sorry for the unclear...

There is no `delete` sysfs under `/sys/class/srp_remote_ports/port-0\:1/` on ppc64le, and module srp_remote_ports was used by ibmvscsi which cannot be removed, we can use the workaround [2] to fix it. [1]...

> Thanks for the fix Yi Zhang. I ran the srp tests after applying your patch but still tests failed with below error. > > ``` > # ./check srp/001...

From [1], seem it was due to the changes in latest mkosi [1] https://github.com/systemd/mkosi/issues/1852

> Further testing proved my original assumption. Closing the issue. The issue still exists after update the parameter, I think this still can be one valid test case and issue,...