Differences of result between mesh(cython) and mesh_numpy version

[rinsa318]

I really appreciate your great work. Your code helped me a lot. I tried to run "7_generate_uv.py". I was able to reproduce same result with you when I use your function named mesh(cython) version. However I got noisy result around border of image when I use mesh_numpy version. Could you please tell me why is this problem happening?

mesh(cython)

mesh_numpy

P.S. the result of position map has noise around border as well when I use mesh_numpy

[yqwu94]

@rinsa318, Hi, can you provide me with your BFW_UV.mat file? I was not able to reproduce same result with you after running 7_generate_uv.py. About the noise around border of image, I thank that you can modify the mesh_core.cpp.

[sublimationAC]

Hi, thank the owner for great work at first. I encountered the same problem. Actually, I read both the numpy and cython version codes. I found there was a difference when judging whether the point is in the triangle. In cython version, the author considers about the border whether it's less than 2 or more than w-2, while not in numpy version, as the result pictures posted by rinsa318. I can't figure out the reason, after thinking for 2 weeks. Does anyone know it, please tell me? Thanks~

[HOMGH]

I really appreciate your great work. Your code helped me a lot. I tried to run "7_generate_uv.py". I was able to reproduce same result with you when I use your function named mesh(cython) version. However I got noisy result around border of image when I use mesh_numpy version. Could you please tell me why is this problem happening?

mesh(cython)

mesh_numpy

P.S. the result of position map has noise around border as well when I use mesh_numpy

Hi Could anyone run demo without error? I'm getting this error: err, "a mismatch between the current graph and the graph") when I use the pre-trained model.