Cleanup ImplicitClone related stuff in the examples

[cecton]

Description

What does this PR do?

1. Use more cheap-to-clone types in the examples
2. Some examples got impacted by #3453 (the removal of ToHtml), I fixed them so we can use reference where it makes sense (I added a few IntoPropValue on cheap-to-clone types)
3. Updated implicit-clone to the latest version
4. Optimized ChildrenRenderer memory allocations by using Rc

Changes did on the side:

1. In order to get some example working, I had to change NodeSeq to use IArray. This is good because it is more optimized for memory allocations too
2. Slightly improve the API of VChild to easily get a ref mut inside its properties object (just for convenience!)

Related to #3453

Checklist

• [x] I have reviewed my own code
• [x] I have added tests

[github-actions[bot]]

Benchmark - core

Yew Master

vnode           fastest       │ slowest       │ median        │ mean          │ samples │ iters
╰─ vnode_clone  2.47 ns       │ 3.034 ns      │ 2.473 ns      │ 2.486 ns      │ 100     │ 1000000000

Pull Request

vnode           fastest       │ slowest       │ median        │ mean          │ samples │ iters
╰─ vnode_clone  2.778 ns      │ 2.97 ns       │ 2.783 ns      │ 2.791 ns      │ 100     │ 1000000000

[github-actions[bot]]

Visit the preview URL for this PR (updated for commit 224e08b):

https://yew-rs-api--pr3508-cleanup-implicit-clo-xpmvce0a.web.app

_{(expires Sun, 26 Nov 2023 10:10:39 GMT)}

_{🔥 via Firebase Hosting GitHub Action 🌎}

[github-actions[bot]]

Benchmark - SSR

Yew Master

Benchmark	Round	Min (ms)	Max (ms)	Mean (ms)	Standard Deviation
Baseline	10	289.308	290.260	289.563	0.272
Hello World	10	477.933	500.649	481.669	6.983
Function Router	10	1595.919	1625.613	1603.911	8.295
Concurrent Task	10	1005.827	1007.602	1006.562	0.529
Many Providers	10	1137.344	1190.735	1149.246	16.474

Pull Request

Benchmark	Round	Min (ms)	Max (ms)	Mean (ms)	Standard Deviation
Baseline	10	289.470	290.042	289.685	0.179
Hello World	10	493.324	507.555	500.525	5.299
Function Router	10	1625.657	1644.951	1633.711	6.780
Concurrent Task	10	1005.268	1006.699	1006.241	0.472
Many Providers	10	1109.017	1125.740	1118.954	5.153

[github-actions[bot]]

Size Comparison

examples	master (KB)	pull request (KB)	diff (KB)	diff (%)
async_clock	100.268	100.273	+0.006	+0.006%
boids	173.785	174.488	+0.703	+0.405%
communication_child_to_parent	92.743	92.832	+0.089	+0.096%
communication_grandchild_with_grandparent	105.757	105.876	+0.119	+0.113%
communication_grandparent_to_grandchild	101.017	101.087	+0.070	+0.070%
communication_parent_to_child	89.086	89.167	+0.081	+0.091%
contexts	105.992	106.008	+0.016	+0.015%
counter	86.119	86.798	+0.679	+0.788%
counter_functional	86.507	87.036	+0.529	+0.612%
dyn_create_destroy_apps	88.983	89.560	+0.576	+0.648%
file_upload	99.992	100.283	+0.291	+0.291%
function_memory_game	172.397	173.153	+0.756	+0.438%
function_router	348.657	349.524	+0.867	+0.249%
function_todomvc	161.174	161.901	+0.728	+0.451%
futures	229.063	229.293	+0.229	+0.100%
game_of_life	110.172	110.262	+0.090	+0.082%
immutable	185.438	188.971	+3.532	+1.905%
inner_html	79.895	79.894	-0.001	-0.001%
js_callback	109.505	110.298	+0.793	+0.724%
keyed_list	199.575	200.350	+0.774	+0.388%
mount_point	82.785	82.786	+0.001	+0.001%
nested_list	113.885	116.348	+2.463	+2.163%
node_refs	90.323	90.403	+0.080	+0.089%
password_strength	1750.117	1750.190	+0.073	+0.004%
portals	93.461	94.175	+0.714	+0.764%
router	317.558	318.463	+0.905	+0.285%
simple_ssr	140.308	141.102	+0.794	+0.566%
ssr_router	385.899	386.830	+0.931	+0.241%
suspense	115.714	116.436	+0.722	+0.624%
timer	88.605	88.947	+0.342	+0.386%
timer_functional	97.970	98.859	+0.890	+0.908%
todomvc	141.336	142.071	+0.735	+0.520%
two_apps	85.824	85.826	+0.002	+0.002%
web_worker_fib	134.758	135.361	+0.604	+0.448%
web_worker_prime	184.959	184.998	+0.039	+0.021%
webgl	82.503	82.505	+0.002	+0.002%

⚠️ The following examples have changed their size significantly:

examples	master (KB)	pull request (KB)	diff (KB)	diff (%)
immutable	185.438	188.971	+3.532	+1.905%
nested_list	113.885	116.348	+2.463	+2.163%

[cecton]

@kirillsemyonkin now I think the benchmark results look good. Not a big improvement but not a lost either except maybe on the "baseline" but that's probably normal.