tacit
tacit copied to clipboard
yegor256
npm test is not failing CI builds
Example: https://travis-ci.org/yegor256/tacit/builds/500324652
Failing checks:
scss/_grid.scss
72:3 warning Expected `float`, found `width` property-sort-order
73:3 warning Expected `width`, found `float` property-sort-order
✖ 2 problems (0 errors, 2 warnings)
Did not fail the build.
Also same happens for Appveyor, https://ci.appveyor.com/project/yegor256/tacit/builds/22747531
@filfreire/z everybody who has role DEV is banned at #195; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually (as in §19), or invite more people (as in §51), or remove the job from the scope (as in §14)
@filfreire/z everybody who has role DEV is banned at #195; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually (as in §19), or invite more people (as in §51), or remove the job from the scope (as in §14)
@filfreire/z everybody who has role DEV is banned at #195; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually (as in §19), or invite more people (as in §51), or remove the job from the scope (as in §14)
@filfreire/z everybody who has role DEV is banned at #195; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually (as in §19), or invite more people (as in §51), or remove the job from the scope (as in §14)
@filfreire/z everybody who has role DEV is banned at #195; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually (as in §19), or invite more people (as in §51), or remove the job from the scope (as in §14)
@filfreire/z everybody who has role DEV is banned at #195; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually (as in §19), or invite more people (as in §51), or remove the job from the scope (as in §14)
@filfreire/z everybody who has role DEV is banned at #195; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually (as in §19), or invite more people (as in §51), or remove the job from the scope (as in §14)
@filfreire/z everybody who has role DEV is banned at #195; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually (as in §19), or invite more people (as in §51), or remove the job from the scope (as in §14)
@filfreire/z everybody who has role DEV is banned at #195; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually (as in §19), or invite more people (as in §51), or remove the job from the scope (as in §14)
@filfreire/z everybody who has role DEV is banned at #195; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually (as in §19), or invite more people (as in §51), or remove the job from the scope (as in §14)
@filfreire There is a problem with this in grunt-sass-lint. We can use --max-warnings=0 for this purpose from sass-lint, but there is a bug https://github.com/sasstools/grunt-sass-lint/issues/25 and we can't pass this param. Option set severity for each rule to 2, which means to recognize them as error, looks not good.
@filfreire/z everybody who has role DEV is banned at #195; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually (as in §19), or invite more people (as in §51), or remove the job from the scope (as in §14)
@filfreire/z everybody who has role DEV is banned at #195; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually (as in §19), or invite more people (as in §51), or remove the job from the scope (as in §14)
@filfreire/z everybody who has role DEV is banned at #195; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually (as in §19), or invite more people (as in §51), or remove the job from the scope (as in §14)
@filfreire/z everybody who has role DEV is banned at #195; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually (as in §19), or invite more people (as in §51), or remove the job from the scope (as in §14)
@filfreire/z everybody who has role DEV is banned at #195; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually (as in §19), or invite more people (as in §51), or remove the job from the scope (as in §14)
@filfreire/z everybody who has role DEV is banned at #195; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually (as in §19), or invite more people (as in §51), or remove the job from the scope (as in §14)
@filfreire/z everybody who has role DEV is banned at #195; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually (as in §19), or invite more people (as in §51), or remove the job from the scope (as in §14)
@filfreire/z everybody who has role DEV is banned at #195; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually (as in §19), or invite more people (as in §51), or remove the job from the scope (as in §14)
@filfreire/z everybody who has role DEV is banned at #195; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually (as in §19), or invite more people (as in §51), or remove the job from the scope (as in §14)