CDN link seems broken for some variations

[filfreire]

It seems for some versions of the CDN link, we're not pointing to the latest released version, example:

https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/gh/yegor256/tacit@gh-pages/tacit-css.min.css

Points to:

/*# sourceMappingURL=tacit-css-1.3.9.min.css.map */

While https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/gh/yegor256/tacit@gh-pages/tacit.min.css

Points to:

/*# sourceMappingURL=tacit-css-1.4.1.min.css.map */

[0crat]

Job #194 is now in scope, role is DEV

[0crat]

Bug was reported, see §29: +15 point(s) just awarded to @filfreire/z

[0crat]

@filfreire/z everybody who has role DEV is banned at #194; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually (as in §19), or invite more people (as in §51), or remove the job from the scope (as in §14)

[MartinKolarik]

@filfreire please check now. We had some @branch URLs incorrectly cached at the CDN level for longer than they were supposed to be.

[0crat]

@filfreire/z everybody who has role DEV is banned at #194; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually (as in §19), or invite more people (as in §51), or remove the job from the scope (as in §14)

[0crat]

@filfreire/z everybody who has role DEV is banned at #194; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually (as in §19), or invite more people (as in §51), or remove the job from the scope (as in §14)

[0crat]

@filfreire/z everybody who has role DEV is banned at #194; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually (as in §19), or invite more people (as in §51), or remove the job from the scope (as in §14)

[0crat]

@filfreire/z everybody who has role DEV is banned at #194; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually (as in §19), or invite more people (as in §51), or remove the job from the scope (as in §14)

[0crat]

@filfreire/z everybody who has role DEV is banned at #194; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually (as in §19), or invite more people (as in §51), or remove the job from the scope (as in §14)

[0crat]

@filfreire/z everybody who has role DEV is banned at #194; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually (as in §19), or invite more people (as in §51), or remove the job from the scope (as in §14)

[0crat]

@filfreire/z everybody who has role DEV is banned at #194; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually (as in §19), or invite more people (as in §51), or remove the job from the scope (as in §14)

[0crat]

@filfreire/z everybody who has role DEV is banned at #194; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually (as in §19), or invite more people (as in §51), or remove the job from the scope (as in §14)

[0crat]

@filfreire/z everybody who has role DEV is banned at #194; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually (as in §19), or invite more people (as in §51), or remove the job from the scope (as in §14)

[0crat]

@filfreire/z everybody who has role DEV is banned at #194; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually (as in §19), or invite more people (as in §51), or remove the job from the scope (as in §14)

[0crat]

@filfreire/z everybody who has role DEV is banned at #194; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually (as in §19), or invite more people (as in §51), or remove the job from the scope (as in §14)