rultor
rultor copied to clipboard
Auto-refresh build logs
Let's add auto-refrsh feature for build logs, like in Travis
@yegor256/z please, pay attention to this issue
@g4s8 but it works exactly that way now. If you open log page, the text will be loaded in runtime, coming from the server. Or it doesn't?
@yegor256 no, at moment you need to refresh the page manually to see new logs
tested on this log: http://www.rultor.com/t/13834-363483177
in two different browsers (Firefox and Chrome)
Rultor's version is 1.67
Job #1244 is now in scope, role is DEV
The job #1244 assigned to @filfreire/z, here is why. The budget is 30 minutes, see §4. Please, read §8 and §9. If the task is not clear, read this and this.
@filfreire/z this job was assigned to you 5 days ago. It will be taken away from you soon, unless you close it, see §8. Read this and this, please.
@filfreire/z this job was assigned to you 8 days ago. It will be taken away from you soon, unless you close it, see §8. Read this and this, please.
@yegor256/z everybody who has role DEV are banned at this job; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually or invite more people to the project, as explained in §51
@yegor256/z everybody who has role DEV are banned at this job; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually or invite more people to the project, as explained in §51
@yegor256/z everybody who has role DEV are banned at this job; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually or invite more people to the project, as explained in §51
@0crat out
@yegor256/z everybody who has role DEV are banned at this job; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually (as in §19), or invite more people (as in §51), or remove the job from the scope (as in §14)
@yegor256/z everybody who has role DEV are banned at this job; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually (as in §19), or invite more people (as in §51), or remove the job from the scope (as in §14)
@0crat out
@yegor256 I'm wondering why you want to exclude this feature request from scope? Would be nice to have...