qulice
qulice copied to clipboard
yegor256
Name 'id' must match pattern '^[a-z]{2,}[a-zA-Z]+$'. (MethodNameCheck)
Hi Guys,
What is the business purpose of this check for the fields and methods with name equal to id?
This name quite self-explaining.
The same is related to PMD
Field id has the same name as a method (AvoidFieldNameMatchingMethodName)Avoid using short method names (ShortMethodName)
Why it can't be added into exclusions?
@dgroup/z this project will fix the problem faster if you donate a few dollars to it; just click here and pay via Stripe, it's very fast, convenient and appreciated; thanks a lot!
@dgroup makes sense (considering that we already have https://github.com/teamed/qulice/issues/593)
@krzyk no response from 0crat more than 7 min. Looks like 0crat went into the infinitive loop due to your #960 self-link :)
Also, I think the same situation with field/method equal to name.
That's also quite self-explaining.
The job #960 assigned to @paulodamaso/z, here is why; the budget is 30 minutes, see §4; please, read §8 and §9; if the task is not clear, read this and this; there will be no monetary reward for this job
@krzyk I believe that it has already been resolved in the linked PRs, what should I do here?
@paulodamaso there wasn't any PR here, the linked issue is for slightly different problem
@0crat refuse (here)
@paulodamaso The user @paulodamaso/z resigned from #960, please stop working. Reason for job resignation: Order was cancelled
@krzyk/z everybody who has role DEV is banned at #960; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually (as in §19), or invite more people (as in §51), or remove the job from the scope (as in §14)
@krzyk/z everybody who has role DEV is banned at #960; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually (as in §19), or invite more people (as in §51), or remove the job from the scope (as in §14)
@krzyk/z everybody who has role DEV is banned at #960; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually (as in §19), or invite more people (as in §51), or remove the job from the scope (as in §14)
@krzyk/z everybody who has role DEV is banned at #960; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually (as in §19), or invite more people (as in §51), or remove the job from the scope (as in §14)
@krzyk/z everybody who has role DEV is banned at #960; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually (as in §19), or invite more people (as in §51), or remove the job from the scope (as in §14)
@krzyk/z everybody who has role DEV is banned at #960; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually (as in §19), or invite more people (as in §51), or remove the job from the scope (as in §14)
@krzyk/z everybody who has role DEV is banned at #960; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually (as in §19), or invite more people (as in §51), or remove the job from the scope (as in §14)