Yegor Bugayenko

@baudoliver7 I'm not against it, but how will it work? Can you give a usage example?

@baudoliver7 it seems we already have something with a similar functionality, don't we?

@baudoliver7 let's do it then

@baudoliver7 yes, `TkCachedFiles` sounds like a good name

@mximp please, take care of this (or delegate)

@Graur please, help

@dours looks like a bug, thanks for reporting, let me investigate

@dours even this one fails: ``` [] > applies-a-few-levels [x] > foo [y] > @ 42 > @ eq. > @ ((foo 1) 2) 42 ``` It interprets `((foo 1)...

@dours this is how we parse `(((foo x) y) z) > a` now: ``` ``` It seems that we should do this instead, introducing two synthetic attributes `a1` and `a2`:...

@andreoss can you fix this? I think, it's a bug in the parser at the level of ANTLR. Would be great to reproduce it first with `PacksTest`. Let's also think...