Olek

Hi @paulromano, I apologize for the frequent pinging. I don't expect anyone to review PRs immediately when I tag them, so I'm a bit embarrassed that I came off in...

Hi @paulromano. Yes this PR is quite large. I appreciate you taking the time to go through it. What fortuitous timing for the monthly meet-up; I'd be happy to swing...

> Thanks for proposing this feature @yardasol! I've had a chance to look into the implementation a little bit more and do feel that the right path forward is to...

Good point @paulromano! And I think this can be done effectively if we are tactical about what specifically we choose to cache (only OpenMC vs OpenMC and all the extra...

Could be useful, espec when doing results analysis.

That makes sense. I have updated the issue to reflect this.

I see your point and I agree. The issue has been updated.

> A design question regarding this — why not just have the user call `export_to_materials` in a loop if they really want `Materials` objects for each step? I personally think...

Amazing work @jtramm. Sorry I didn't get around to reviewing this. I do have a quick comment: on lines 47-49 of `random_ray.rst`, the following section of text was removed from...

> Cool cool @stchaker. Going public with it might be nice. I think just figuring out how to break this into a bunch of smaller pieces of work to do...