Yann Simon
Yann Simon
Thanks, I'll have a look at this later.
What is the best way to review this? Generating doc locally and comparing with the current version?
This is looking very interesting. Should we move forward with this?
> I think we've made a point to _not_ handle any conventional, or even standard headers for "original" request data from proxies in `ConnectInfo`, because it can be spoofed at...
That's a good point. I'd like that we make users aware of the risks of using those extractors somehow, but I don't have better idea for now. Having them in...
> @yanns yeah I agree, it would be nice to do more than just exclude these from the main crate. But also I think it wouldn't be great to hold...
I've added an issue about spoofable extractors: https://github.com/tokio-rs/axum/issues/2998
My 2 cents is that we should optimize for the developer experience. So I'd vote to avoid the `include_str!` for now as not all the developer tooling is able to...
Yes, that would be great. I'm trying to compare 2 documents for test purpose, and if I compare the `.to_string()`, I need to handle some cases like: ``` type Review...
I don't use this link. It can be removed IMO.