connect ECONNREFUSED 127.0.0.1:1080

[telegrambotdeveloper]

Bug Report

I have read:

• Usage information
• Help information

I am using the latest version of the library.

Expected Behavior

I tried use Telegram bot throught SOCKS 5 proxy, but I got this error message: "Unhandled rejection RequestError: Error: connect ECONNREFUSED 127.0.0.1:1080@

Actual Behavior

When I start the bot it works 5 seconds and then I get error message "Unhandled rejection RequestError: Error: connect ECONNREFUSED 127.0.0.1:1080"

I have searched for the errors like that in issues of proxy usage and found none.

Example of request

I use socks5-https-client like @nskondratev recommended in this message: https://github.com/yagop/node-telegram-bot-api/issues/562#issuecomment-382313307

const Agent = require("socks5-https-client/lib/Agent");
var bot = new TelegramBot(appConfig.token, {
    webHook: {
        port: appConfig.webhook.port
    },
    request: {
        agentClass: Agent,
		agentOptions: {
			socksHost: appConfig.proxy.hostname,
            socksPort: appConfig.proxy.port,
            socksUsername: appConfig.proxy.login,
            socksPassword: appConfig.proxy.password
        }
    }
});

What problem can it be? Why is there request to localhost (I think that 127.0.0.1 is localhost)? How can I solve this issue. I can't find the reffernce of this ip address in the code of the module.

[telegrambotdeveloper]

I supposed that the problem is the proxy what I use, but when I use another proxy the problem was again. I tried another method for proxy by property "request".

var bot = new TelegramBot(appConfig.token, {
    webHook: {
        port: appConfig.webhook.port
    },
    request: {
        proxy:'http://secret@hostname:port'
    }
});

It think that it work, but my bot doesn't answer my messages. I try to log message in the function for bot.on('message'), but the debug console keeps silence. What do you think? What problem can it be? Please, help me.

[tyt34]

This is works https://github.com/yagop/node-telegram-bot-api/issues/562#issuecomment-445222580