Changed example commands regex

[seadog007]

• [ ] All tests pass (Didn't run it since I am not change the lib source)
• [x] I have run npm run doc

Description

Changed the examples and README.md since lots of people wrote codes with copying the example, which might cause the bot to match URL or other things.

Generally, the only thing that should consider as a command is a string start with special character (in this case "/") Therefore, the following should be considering as a command

/echo 123
/help

but not these

I found a file under /bin, which is /bin/echo What is is file for in Linux? 
http://help.google.com/

Using the original example will resulting as

References

Nope

[kamikazechaser]

You probably also want to add the regex terminator to some of these examples i.e. $

[seadog007]

@kamikazechaser I did consider that, but since there might be something like /command@botname, and regex will be ^\/command(@.*|$). I don't think complexing the example is a good idea then. Therefore, I was not adding that to the PR, or should I?

[kamikazechaser]

/command@botname

This is usually in groups. Yeah I think you should add it for uniformity.

[danielperez9430]

This regex is still wrong, becuase @.* is any character include espace and other text that not match.

/test@mytest_bot and /test@mytest_bot hello test is match.

This weekend I will review it

[seadog007]

@danielperez9430 Well, I will simply ignore the argument for the commands that doesn't require args. but for something like /echo, I did use ^\/echo(?:@.*?)? (.+), or you prefer ^\/echo(?:@.*?)?( .*|$) ?

[kamikazechaser]

Yeah I think you should add it for uniformity.

Btw I meant the regex terminator here, not adding @botname to the regex. Otherwise the PR is okay after that change.