Alexandre Mutel

> But I have not succeeded in finding out what engine is working under the hood, is it [commonmark](https://commonmark.org)-compliant? [GFM](https://github.github.com/gfm/) support? I think there is a high probability it's based...

[OS X ABI Mach-O File Format Reference](https://github.com/aidansteele/osx-abi-macho-file-format-reference) for more information

I don't remember that it was clearly specified in the specs (left to the implementation), and babelmark indicates that most CommonMark implementation are escaping [here](https://babelmark.github.io/?text=%5Blink%5D(https%3A%2F%2Fpan.test.com%2Fs%2F%3Fpwd%3D93d3%26path%3D%252Fv%252Ffid)) It has been the behavior...

> a JSON object directly without needing to convert it to a C# object first. What do you mean exactly by JSON object? e.g. `System.Text.Json.JsonElement`? It would require a bit...

Could you post a reproducible simple `Program.cs` just to make sure about your exact use case?

I can see in the tests that there are no tests with struct, so it is likely that I didn't need struct for my use cases and so didn't implement...

(So, as a workaround, if you can, use class for now. It could be that I won't support this scenario - because I don't have a personal interest to implement...

> Changing the struct to a class is unideal for my situation which requires the use of structs for performance. Yeah, Tomlyn was not really designed with performance in mind...

> If you point me in the right direction, I can take a look and attempt a PR when I get some time, if you're open to adding support for...

> For now, in scriban I have this : > > ``` > {{ modules_html = include 'modules_html.scriban' }} > > {{ modules_html[element.type](element) }} > ``` `include` is a function...