Volodymyr Gubarkov comments

Results 24 comments of


                                            Volodymyr Gubarkov

Some form of "standard library"?

I see. I would prefer not to do it via the built-ins. Firstly, I want to keep the core tool simple. Secondly, I don't want to support the "standard lib"...

Some form of "standard library"?

Hey @08d2! Could you please take a look at #115. Do you think this design approach can help with your use-case?

Some form of "standard library"?

Hey @08d2! I've released v0.9.20 with parameterized goals support! I think this should be applicable to your use-case. Please see the documentation https://github.com/xonixx/makesure#parameterized-goals.

Redo `std.awk` generation using `gawktexi.in`

Till we do this we need to add to repo "working" HTMLs.

Add support for GAWK extentions

Understand if `com.intellij.util.indexing.IndexableSetContributor` can help here.

For empty args don't produce `@` in instantiated goal names

This doesn't appear to be easy

Add alternatives overview

https://blog.kellybrazil.com/2020/03/25/jello-the-jq-alternative-for-pythonistas/

Add alternatives overview

https://github.com/jsqry/jsqry-cli2/issues/23

Add support for embeded AWK syntax highlighting

Related: https://github.com/xonixx/intellij-awk/issues/123

Makesure can not be used to execute two goals with effects that counter each other

This is interesting question indeed. For sure changing the operational semantics can hurt the intended declarative nature of the tool. For example, now any goal runs at most one time,...