xkilian
xkilian
I would like to allocate ressources to implement this feature. As this will involve material investment, I would like to validate that if such a change is done, it can...
1. It cannot be done in the current generator code base, as currently we have to maintain a dozen different generators with their own associated mibs. 2. Even if an...
The main take away here is that you do not want to maintain additional general code in the snmp collection engine. At the cost of pushing major complexity out beyond...
@karanlik Solving this in a generator is a false good idea without greatly changing the way it interacts with snmp_exporter, IMO. I believe I have described why it is not...
@SuperQ It is not the how to get, as Brian mentioned, the tool is based on netsnmp(which is super efficient) and uses the correct methods of getting the data. It...
I would actually suggest we select what state becomes has the triangle. I have a case where it is: 0 ok, 1-98 warning , 99 offline, 100 critical. I would...
Pro: - Less config bloat for configurations that handle multiple versions of the same device: (ex. 24 port switch monitor only uplinks, 24 port switch monitor all ports, 24 port...
The work being done on other PRs is in fact to split the processing of each family of devices associated with a generator.yml file and its associated snmp mibs as...
Sorry Arnaud, I have no feedback for you at this time, I am not running any Grafana 7.x yet. I was waiting for legacy panels to be converted and all...
Ah, I stand corrected, I will give it a try.