Julius Parulek
Julius Parulek
> Why is the way using `bqueues` as outlined in the issue not an option? 🤔 `bqueues` is flaky and can still fail, ie. not reliable source of working queues....
The verification step could be done actually in scheduler (before submitting all the realization to the queue). For instance when instantiating the driver (driver.validate -> bool), in case it fails...
Closing this issue as it is duplicate of #7112
I guess I might close this one then: https://github.com/equinor/ert/issues/8867 But there I got another error though despise the same symptoms. ``` Couldn't establish connection with the ensemble evaluator! unexpected error:...
> Another failure here: https://github.com/equinor/ert/actions/runs/11178734497/job/31077529370 Now it has passed, so let's wait a bit if it occurs again. https://github.com/equinor/ert/actions/runs/11211818618/job/31164485346
Can this be closed @oyvindeide ?
I think it would be nice to write a test for this. At least the `ErtCliError`.
Looks nice @JHolba ! Just had a smaller comment on testing all update experiments in the gui test.
We should get some feedback on forward_model_ok state when hovering over the realization. Let's see if this issue is still valid. Nevertheless this does not check whether it contains the...
This requires some more explanation what the actual warning (after running testrun and ensemble experiment) should be.