Kshitij Sobti

> Hi @xitij2000 - is this PR still needed? If so, I can get it reviewed. Looks like it fell off the radar. I think this work is overshadowed by...

Since I'm no longer sure if the information here is accurate, I am closing the PR.

These changes will be incorporated with the ruby 3 PR: https://github.com/openedx/cs_comments_service/pull/392

> Pagination for learners stats is broken. This provides a fix for this issue. Is this still needed, or does https://github.com/openedx/cs_comments_service/pull/396 fix this issue?

> Tested all good!. I've incorporated this commit into my ruby 3 upgrade PR since without that the forum service is broken on unicorn.

> @xitij2000 Is this a breaking change? It should not be. This PR is tested against both the current version of Ruby (2.5.7) and on Ruby 3.0.x. However, the idea...

> The only thing that stands out at this time is the proposed graded discussion xblock. As mentioned in the proposal, part of BD-38 was meant to replace the discussion...

> @xitij2000 Do you have thoughts about how that XBlock would work in practice? What would an author need to do if Discussions should be graded universally in a course?...

> @xitij2000 I like your idea. However I have one question, how do you plan to handle the case of grading discussions that are related to a specific topic/unit? As...

> 2U partners have also been requesting grading for LTI discussion tools. I think LTI already supports grading if I remember correctly. So should already be a way to grade...