#21 (documentation) is still not fixed 1 year later

[KatPurpy]

#21 opusfile documentation is STILL not regenerated

HTML and PDF version of the documentation remain mostly empty.

Can you please fix it? Not everyone wants to compile documentation just to check it out as well it is a bit inconvenient and feels extremely unprofessional

[petterreinholdtsen]

[maculateConception]

I totally agree ... I actually thought that it was a cruel joke when I saw the blank pages.

I am very sorry to hear the product did not meet your expectations. I'll organize a refund for the license fee you paid for opusfile right away.

We all agree that the documentation issue should be fixed. Sadly there are too few volunteer hours available.

-- Happy hacking Petter Reinholdtsen

[KatPurpy]

[maculateConception] I totally agree ... I actually thought that it was a cruel joke when I saw the blank pages. I am very sorry to hear the product did not meet your expectations. I'll organize a refund for the license fee you paid for opusfile right away. We all agree that the documentation issue should be fixed. Sadly there are too few volunteer hours available. … -- Happy hacking Petter Reinholdtsen

do you have so little volunteer hours you literally do not have 5 minutes to run doxygen and update the website?

[rillian]

If you can fix this in 5 minutes, please submit a PR!

[tdaede]

Specifically, the opus website is here: https://gitlab.xiph.org/xiph/opus-website

[rillian]

I believe this has been addressed.

[KatPurpy]

hello, i am sorry for acting arrogant