xinbenlv
@Pandapip1 updated eip-template.md Now 1. Request to remove label `waiting: EIP number` 2. Request for review and merge
If there is no objection, and we have not fixed the bot yet, I'd suggest a manual merge so new EIPs can start using RFC 8174
@eth-bot please merge
Oh, I see, it was not obvious to me that it is waiting for three more approval for updating EIP-1, @SamWilsn as it shows Could you grant your approvals? @axic...
> Is there a reason you don't update the actual RFC number in the anchor? Which anchor? Could you share the screenshot of what you refer to?
> Can we at least move it to an endnote? It's just clutter when dropped into the middle of the most important part of an EIP. @gcolvin I agree with...
> I'm generally OK with this, but if would cause a less clutter as a footnote. I'd be even happier to make this a general policy that applies to all...
@axic @lightclient IIUC this proposal require your editor approval too. Could you share your feedback or approval?
> Are we going to update all the EIPs that only refer to RFC 2119? @lightclient I don't think it's necessary to update all existing EIPs. I think we can...
Friendly ping @axic for last approval