Meng Xuan Xia

Sounds good! My only concern is that the new interface generation will not be compatible with the current way we typecheck query returns (see example https://github.com/SweetIQ/schemats#writing-code-with-typed-schema) Maybe these information can...

> Here's what I suggest: > > ```typescript > type HasTypeKey = { > [K in keyof T]: { > type: any > } > } > type SimpleSchema =...

Yeah looks like not everything is easily accessible. Not having MySQL support for now would be fine, someone interested in it will eventually make a PR :D Feel free to...

I think allowing the constructor to be extended with options is a good choice. Please make a pull request and let's look at it together. Also could you elaborate on...

Cool so I changed the title to a more descriptive one. We will keep this one open for visibility.

Good spot @adamcee !

Nice! Not generating `XXXfields` namespace requires a major version bump. I will first update the examples in README to encourage the use of index access types (#47). Then revisit this...

> For this reason, perhaps we should not deprecate XXXFields until Typescript allows dot notation to access types ? That's an important point. For this reason let's deprecate XXXFields only...

Ideally a new fork of this project would start from someone who uses it regularly, perhaps using it as part of a production setup. I started a fork last year...

In that case, why not create a schemats organization and fork it from there. There was a steady growth of users (whether it's from CI or not), so there's some...