Green Baneling

It is a master issue to track progress on the migration of the off-chain table. Since we decided to split migration into two parts, on-chain and off-chain, it has its...

Is done as part of the https://github.com/FuelLabs/fuel-core/issues/1545

Maybe it is duplicate of the https://github.com/FuelLabs/fuel-core/issues/950. Or maybe it is a master issue and https://github.com/FuelLabs/fuel-core/issues/950 is a sub issue=) @bvrooman What do you think?

Main tests are done. Remaining testing will be done in the https://github.com/FuelLabs/fuel-core/issues/950

Blocked by https://github.com/FuelLabs/fuel-core/issues/649

@Voxelot Do we need this issue?=)

Closing since we don't see a reason

I guess any error that we receive from the request/response protocol should decrease the reputation of the peer regardless of the reason.

The current implementation ignores the error from the `convert_to_response` method. We need to handle it and, [in the same way](https://github.com/FuelLabs/fuel-core/issues/1345), send an error or `None` into the `channel`.

The `-D warnings ` doesn't work in the case of `cargo make`, it is why we've added `!#[deny(warnings)]`