Accepts content type jsonlines

[alexdivet]

What changes are proposed in this pull request?

I wrote a function to parse line-delimited JSON (more details here).

As detailed in this issue, application/jsonlines is the recommended CONTENT_TYPE when deploying a model to SageMaker Batch Transform.

How is this patch tested?

I added the relevant tests in tests/pyfunc/test_scoring_server, namely

• test_scoring_server_responds_to_invalid_jsonlines_input_with_stacktrace_and_error_code
• test_scoring_server_successfully_evaluates_correct_dataframes_with_jsonlines
• test_jsonlines_to_df

Does this PR change the documentation?

• [x] No. You can skip the rest of this section.
• [ ] Yes. Make sure the changed pages / sections render correctly by following the steps below.

1. Check the status of the ci/circleci: build_doc check. If it's successful, proceed to the next step, otherwise fix it.
2. Click Details on the right to open the job page of CircleCI.
3. Click the Artifacts tab.
4. Click docs/build/html/index.html.
5. Find the changed pages / sections and make sure they render correctly.

Release Notes

Is this a user-facing change?

• [x] No. You can skip the rest of this section.
• [ ] Yes. Give a description of this change to be included in the release notes for MLflow users.

(Details in 1-2 sentences. You can just refer to another PR with a description if this PR is part of a larger change.)

What component(s), interfaces, languages, and integrations does this PR affect?

Components

• [ ] area/artifacts: Artifact stores and artifact logging
• [ ] area/build: Build and test infrastructure for MLflow
• [ ] area/docs: MLflow documentation pages
• [ ] area/examples: Example code
• [ ] area/model-registry: Model Registry service, APIs, and the fluent client calls for Model Registry
• [x] area/models: MLmodel format, model serialization/deserialization, flavors
• [ ] area/projects: MLproject format, project running backends
• [x] area/scoring: MLflow Model server, model deployment tools, Spark UDFs
• [ ] area/server-infra: MLflow Tracking server backend
• [ ] area/tracking: Tracking Service, tracking client APIs, autologging

Interface

• [ ] area/uiux: Front-end, user experience, plotting, JavaScript, JavaScript dev server
• [ ] area/docker: Docker use across MLflow's components, such as MLflow Projects and MLflow Models
• [ ] area/sqlalchemy: Use of SQLAlchemy in the Tracking Service or Model Registry
• [ ] area/windows: Windows support

Language

• [ ] language/r: R APIs and clients
• [ ] language/java: Java APIs and clients
• [ ] language/new: Proposals for new client languages

Integrations

• [ ] integrations/azure: Azure and Azure ML integrations
• [ ] integrations/sagemaker: SageMaker integrations
• [ ] integrations/databricks: Databricks integrations

How should the PR be classified in the release notes? Choose one:

• [ ] rn/breaking-change - The PR will be mentioned in the "Breaking Changes" section
• [ ] rn/none - No description will be included. The PR will be mentioned only by the PR number in the "Small Bugfixes and Documentation Updates" section
• [x] rn/feature - A new user-facing feature worth mentioning in the release notes
• [ ] rn/bug-fix - A user-facing bug fix worth mentioning in the release notes
• [ ] rn/documentation - A user-facing documentation change worth mentioning in the release notes

[dbczumar]

Hi @alexdivet , are there any updates here?

[dbczumar]

Hi @alexdivet , are there any updates here?

[dbczumar]

Hi @alexdivet , are there any updates here?

[alexdivet]

hi @dbczumar – I'm afraid my priorities have shifted lately and I haven't found time to dedicate to this. I guess you can close this PR for now and I'll open a new one with your suggested changes later when I get back to it

[dbczumar]

No problem, @alexdivet. I'm going to go ahead and close this for now :)