xdBronch

looks like theres already a pr for this https://github.com/ziglang/zig/pull/19503

for context i believe people trying to emit docs from a test (step) comes from zig only libraries which only expose a module and no type of `Step.Compile`. since standalone...

functions with parameters on multiple lines are rendered weirdly  should either trim the whitespace or render on multiple lines here as well

> Parameter-specific documentation is disallowed by zig fmt'd code im not sure what you mean? doc comments on parameters is certainly allowed. see this code for example  did you...

i dont think many of these simplifications would be possible since they may rely on type information that `zig fmt` doesnt have access to

thanks, yeah i saw that file earlier. its the only std test case in there which is a little weird imo but i guess fmt has lots of `@compileError`s. im...

i realized that there really wasnt much point not testing this so i adjusted a test to account for this change and added a similar change + test for the...

im disappointed but i understand, the fix/improvement being in the compiler itself will be much better

> Why wouldn't the function name and file be reused? because it wont always be called from the same function and file

i believe this is planned in some form not just for splat but the other builtins as well, e.g. `@intFromFloat`, `@intCast`, etc. but it needs to be worked out how...