xamidi

Results 22 comments of xamidi

> I wouldn't count on it. Eclipse IDE is written in Java which can give all kinds of overhead. Which kind of overhead could lead to such horrible delays? Since...

> I simply refuse to install anything written in Java on my machine. Java may be bad (and I've been refusing to write code in it for around 10 years),...

Regarding the high compilation duration issue, I have now uploaded a [small project](https://github.com/xamidi/pmGenerator) (that is part of the big project I mentioned), which shows the issue, to try yourself if...

You used the x86_64 `g++` variant, right? Your script doesn't show any more compiler flags than `-std=c++20`, is that the only one you used? Note that I used compiler flags...

On another note, what is the ``` # fix undefined weeks in helper/FctHelper.cpp if ! ${CXX:-g++} --version|grep -q clang; then mv helper/FctHelper.cpp helper/FctHelper.cpp.bak && echo "#include " > helper/FctHelper.cpp &&...

@brechtsanders Then you're probably using a wrong source base when building with g++, which could also explain the missing warnings and different timing results. But I'll wait for your settings.

> @xamidi My codebase has built close to 3000 packages from source, nothing wrong with it. Have you considered using GitHub Actions to build it on different platforms, to see...

> I don't expect warning levels to impact speed much And it doesn't, as I have shown. You mentioned that you weren't given any warnings, which is because you didn't...

> Can you check if you see a speed improvement in your scenario? Yes, the issue of [Resources.cpp](https://github.com/xamidi/pmGenerator/blob/master/helper/Resources.cpp) taking ludicrous durations to compile, has been fixed for GCC 13.1! -...

Not sure why you closed this, when only the side issue (compile duration) was resolved. The main issue was about link duration of big debug files, and `-fuse-ld=lld` not being...