Alexandre Couedelo
Alexandre Couedelo
It is about the same, but an `include` feature seems more complex to implement. Simply having the deepmerge option would cover most of the cases. As far as I know,...
Hi @mcsescott, Thanks for the feedback it helps me improve the tutorial. First, make sure your application has the right permissions. Luckily it is now easy to do with App...
If the manifest is correct you should see the event logged in when you open App Home. Like this: ``` socketmode: 2021/07/11 11:49:51 socket_mode_managed_conn.go:336: Received WebSocket message: {"envelope_id":"ec3e6fbc-c624-4cf9-b709-ed56788497cd","payload":{"token":"WvsrrpDjaTWiZLsGcuXGUQrh","team_id":"T01KL8ALRPU","api_app_id":"A01PM8UB8JG","event":{"type":"app_home_opened","user":"U01K5EZ9A7R","channel":"D01P8ARNXK8","tab":"home","view":{"id":"V01PL81GWDR","team_id":"T01KL8ALRPU","type":"home","blocks":[{"type":"section","block_id":"4+o","text":{"type":"mrkdwn","text":"*Welcome Back!* \nThis...
related issue: https://github.com/slack-go/slack/issues/943
It is two separate commands ``` go mod init go get -u github.com/slack-go/slack ``` `go mod init` create the `go.mod` file and `go get` installs dependencies.
I have identified two bugs related to the `app_home_opened` event: * Once you initialized the Home, all subsequent events are `error_bad_message` * The event seems sometimes not to be correctly...
I monkey patched [appHomeController.go](https://github.com/xNok/slack-go-demo-socketmode/blob/main/controllers/appHomeController.go) to make the demo work. I believe now that `app_home_opened` has been updated on Slack's side but it has not been reflecting in `slack-go`, thus the...
I ran some more experiments ``` {{ relPath (shell "bash" "-c" "echo $PWD") outputFolder }} ``` This results in `../../subfolder/subsubfolder`, so my conclusion is that `$PWD` is actually the template...
I will look into making a PR, just need to put my head into the code at some point. The best working solution so far ``` {{ relPath (env "PWD"...
> Hey @xNok ! > > Curious what you think of this possible change? 😄 > > I am also thinking about decoupling the Processor from the OPA Backend (so...