Walter Lapchynski

Agreeing with @agaida's comments about security in `xscreensaver` (which is themable without using other toolkits— including the lock dialog itself— but that's not our job) I'll also add if you...

@agaida is right, but he quoted the meat of the `detectDE()` function, but that doesn't cover what I suggested. In the "main" of the script are four overrides to the...

@agaida you're right assuming the code can correctly handle those edge cases, which isn't always the case. This is why in this self-same issue @Vladimir-csp linked a bug about an...

Here's all the "keepers" in my mind. The rest can go: * attaction * decayscreen * flame * drift * goop * grav * kaleidescope * pipes * atlantis *...

> If anything remains ;) Dude, that's 46 out of like [200](https://www.jwz.org/xscreensaver/screenshots/). Also to add to the whole thing about security, there are actual [examples](https://www.jwz.org/blog/2015/04/i-told-you-so-again/) of the `xscreensaver` forks failing...

> I don't want to defend a program that I'm not familiar with but that link was about gnome-screensaver. I was referring to your [comment](https://github.com/lxqt/lxqt/issues/1378#issuecomment-515767241) that `gnome-screensaver` derived from `xscreensaver`....

> and we know how Gnome devs do things And in this I think both you, jwz, and I all agree :rofl:

For me when I saw the whole "GTK4 is not GTK4" post I was convinced they were insane.

GTK is hopefully going to be quite literally beyond my imagination once 18.04 is EoL and we're supporting LXQt full time!

The functional pragmatism of LXQt is indeed its goal, stated or not :smile: