will wieder

@olyson can you briefly introduce this topic / issue at the CLM meeting this Thursday at 2? Most of our hour will be spent on the SIF GPP work, but...

This separate land unit for FATES seems like a good one to me. It also seems absurd to try and run a FATES-SP with CROP transient compset, at least on...

A *very* quick look of a CENTURY run suggests that this may be limited to `MICC_HR` & `TOTMIC*`, which I think are just MIMICS variables? Maybe this isn't much of...

Thanks for looking into this @olyson. @billsacks I agree with your suggested solutions, which of these seem like the best option?For option_2 @swensosc suggested we could consider creating _desert_ (bare...

Yes, that would be great, @billsacks, as Sean's mosart changes don't help with the negative runoff from wetland islands. @olyson, I recall you saying last week that frozen runoff in...

thanks for checking this, Keith. I still wonder if we addressed @billsacks question on negative net runoff fluxes from amazonian grid cells that we started discussing at co-chairs?

Thanks for digging into this, @XueliHuo. It does look like this is a bug. Including `livecroot_mr_patch(p)` should be in the in the calculation of root respiration fluxes.

@ekluzek can you make open PR to address this. I'll review it when you're ready.

Finally, I'm assuming that root and soil respiration fluxes are both diagnostic history fields that won't mess up our balance checks.

woo! On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 11:05 AM Erik Kluzek wrote: > Testing on cheyenne ran as expected with everything identical except the > clm5_1 tests. > > —...