lazymio
> @wtdcode wdyt? Spare me a few days as I need to get 2.1.3 out. We broken a few distributions unfortunately. I will be back to polish unicornafl. The implementation...
Sorry for late. This looks good to me and we need to move on =)
> It's trivial (at least for Solidity). I'll add this to the backlog and implement it later. Maybe we can consider prioritizing this? This helps generate a somehow "full" abi.
I can help implement this so that evmole can return a full `Function`
Oh, you are correct. My own code always ignores this field so I forget this. Maybe another standalone function to return if a selector is `payable` or not.
My two cents: to increase precision, we should firstly decode abi and ensure the call data conforms with abi? Why the precision is just 60%? Your algorithm seems good and...
Yes, I misunderstood. ________________________________ From: Maxim Andreev ***@***.***> Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2024 5:47:43 PM To: cdump/evmole ***@***.***> Cc: lazymio ***@***.***>; Comment ***@***.***> Subject: Re: [cdump/evmole] Can add detect function...
Nice catch and thanks @vanhauser-thc for the quick fix.
Found this by chance. We improved the Python bindings but still maintained backward compatibility.
The slowdown is expected but 450x sounds too much for me. How to reproduce?