Will Robertson

(As a side note, if you're changing every alphabet range you *should* be able to just write `range=up`...)

I don't really see how. Maybe I am missing something, or maybe this feature doesn't quite work as I expect. Actually in the next release of unicode-math this example won't...

I think I now agree and this was something that stalled me last time I started looking at this:  The first is `\normalsize` scaled up, and the second is...

(If have to admit I'm still a little unsure about it all though.)

@RuixiZhang42 — you are correct, the apology should be mine. From the CM perspective optical scaling is being used, it's just not as extreme in the large case. I agree...

Hmm, I’m not sure about this. For sure I need to improve the interfaces here, but changing maths font mid-document is a very “heavy” operation and I don’t want to...

Thanks for the detailed analysis. You’re completely right — really the entire “version” feature needs careful re-consideration. The way it interacts with “range” is not handled properly, and this is...

You're not doing anything wrong, unfortunately — unicode-math has some significant limitations over how these features can be combined. I'll try to take a look at this problem ASAP, but...

@davidcarlisle / @eg9 — unicode-math (perhaps foolishly) already interprets these unicode chars as if the user intended to write a maths subscript (like how `'` works in traditional LaTeX). If...

@siddharthist Apologies for the inconvenience — as you can probably tell from the commit history of this package, I haven't found the time to work on it in quite some...