wrf-model
Add successful test to WPS at end of compile.
Just an idea that pop up when configuring and compiling WRF & WPS.
In WRF at the end of the compile script you get this message:
==========================================================================
build started: Mon Dec 26 08:32:51 PM CST 2022
build completed: Mon Dec 26 08:40:16 PM CST 2022
---> Executables successfully built <---
-rwxrwxr-x 1 workhorse workhorse 47562896 Dec 26 20:40 main/ndown.exe
-rwxrwxr-x 1 workhorse workhorse 47689904 Dec 26 20:40 main/real.exe
-rwxrwxr-x 1 workhorse workhorse 46825832 Dec 26 20:40 main/tc.exe
-rwxrwxr-x 1 workhorse workhorse 55673560 Dec 26 20:39 main/wrf.exe
But at the end of WPS you get this message:
gfortran -ffree-form -O -fconvert=big-endian -frecord-marker=4 -I/home/workhorse/WRF/WRFV4.4.2/external/io_netcdf -I/home/workhorse/WRF/WRFV4.4.2/external/io_grib_share -I/home/workhorse/WRF/WRFV4.4.2/external/io_grib1 -I/home/workhorse/WRF/WRFV4.4.2/external/io_int -I/home/workhorse/WRF/WRFV4.4.2/inc -I/home/workhorse/WRF/Libs/NETCDF/include -c int2nc.f90
gfortran -o int2nc.exe -I/home/workhorse/WRF/WRFV4.4.2/external/io_netcdf -I/home/workhorse/WRF/WRFV4.4.2/external/io_grib_share -I/home/workhorse/WRF/WRFV4.4.2/external/io_grib1 -I/home/workhorse/WRF/WRFV4.4.2/external/io_int -I/home/workhorse/WRF/WRFV4.4.2/inc -I/home/workhorse/WRF/Libs/NETCDF/include int2nc.o module_debug.o misc_definitions_module.o read_met_module.o cio.o -L/home/workhorse/WRF/WRFV4.4.2/external/io_grib1 -lio_grib1 -L/home/workhorse/WRF/WRFV4.4.2/external/io_grib_share -lio_grib_share -L/home/workhorse/WRF/WRFV4.4.2/external/io_int -lwrfio_int -L/home/workhorse/WRF/WRFV4.4.2/external/io_netcdf -lwrfio_nf -L/home/workhorse/WRF/Libs/NETCDF/lib -lnetcdff -lnetcdf
make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/workhorse/WRF/WPS-4.4/util/src'
if [ -h int2nc.exe ] ; then \
/bin/rm -f int2nc.exe ; \
fi ; \
if [ -h ../int2nc.exe ] ; then \
/bin/rm -f ../int2nc.exe ; \
fi ; \
if [ -e src/int2nc.exe ] ; then \
ln -sf src/int2nc.exe . ; \
fi
Since these two software are meant to work together shouldn't they have a similar output at the end?
@mgduda @weiwangncar
Just following up on this request to see if it can be implemented into the next release
@mgduda @weiwangncar @kkeene44
Just wanted to follow up on this feature request
I think this is something worth considering for the next WPS release.
Thank you. V5.0? @mgduda
I think this is something worth considering for the next WPS release.
Great!