LJ

@sebCIL Thought I'd give you an update. I am happy with this PR, but am holding off while I figure out if this belongs in the base of the extension...

Interesting idea, but a lot harder to implement than it seems.

@m-tyler We might be able to hide errors that come from 'external sources', which in my mind means any include/copy file, but not file declarations that you mentioned.

Yeah, for sure it's possible and I always wanted to do something like this.

Sounds like we need an additional option so the user can configure where to make a copy of the source before we make changes to the member. Sounds like a...

Yes. It will be open source. I am currently waiting on IBM to share some of the host debug server APIs so we can implement remote debugging. No idea when...

I thought about reverse engineering it also, but I only have so much time in the day. I think if you did that you should document as much as possible....

That is understandable. I will keep poking the people at IBM regularly to see if they can help us. Also, I believe the auth is similar to how it works...

@merhovon No updates here. IBM still has nothing to share with us. It's frustrating. COBOL-IT uses a local COBOL debugger. As we know, IBM has remote debugger APIs but they...

I am all for it. Think it's an awesome idea. Maybe in the future, it could be a context menu to 'export as PDF', which in turn would run that...