Passing on development?

[sphh]

@IlgarLunin, there seems to be some need to keep this wonderful project alive and also some recent momentum to maintain and develop a fork (e.g. here).

Since you mentioned in #106, that you stopped working on it (which is really a pity, because this is some fabulous piece of software!), would you be prepared to pass on the development? I believe, this is always a better choice than to start a fork (with a new name etc ets), which often causes confusion and upgrading problems.

What do you think?