Wolf Vollprecht
Wolf Vollprecht
PS i have had this "fake execution" of a transaction in mind for a while because it would allow us to test the solver in a simpler way (without downloading...
Hi @JerryMaoQC again, sorry that this process is a bit slow. I see two possibilities for a clean solution: First create a solve, then add pins for all packages from...
Note, what I am describing in the gist -- for your use-case we'd need to transform an annotated yaml into the structure proposed there. But that should be straightforward once...
Another use case could be a package REPL (similar to what Julia has) where one could go like: ``` > add numpy + numpy 1.2 > add tensorflow ... adding...
Another use case could be a package REPL (similar to what Julia has) where one could go like: ``` > add numpy + numpy 1.2 > add tensorflow ... adding...
@JerryMaoQC this would be like an "interactive" dry-run. Another place where this could be very useful is in `boa`: we have an interactive mode where you can run a recipe,...
Hmm, interesting issue. Is the consensus that automatic dependency variants should only come from `host` dependencies? It would be a pretty easy change on the rattler-build side. We currently take...
yes, or help with the CEP :pray: we need to write and get it voted on.https://github.com/conda/ceps/pull/102
We could also make it easier for people in the test section of the recipe. Currently we often test for files using the commands test section which is really cumbersome...
Sure, these could be good things to upstream. I hope to add package testing to boa next week