Aaron Wolf

Thanks! If you do what I said about getting a pro account at whenisgood, you can see how it manages this with a very small and clean UI.

Maybe make a Label for items you'd welcome someone else to fix? FLO software is ostensibly about anyone being able to contribute to the development…

@kfogel be super wary of all forced-ranking systems. They are pathalogical and can result in endless complex debates about the various ramifications of the ranking algorithms. You can do endless...

@kfogel please take my word for it: there is not some total-relativism here. Ranked voting systems are fundamentally far more pathological and there are not comparable pathologies with score voting....

@kfogel :) for reference, the electology folks have specifically taken the rangevoting.org stuff with the goal of making it more presentable, but need to do a far better job. All...

@kfogel don't want to continue long discussion here, but score voting can have a range of anything, even 1-100 (or 0-99) so if you want higher resolution, you can get...

For reference, I think it's far better to make the range a setting the user can adjust. There's evidence that 1-10 is a nice enough resolution and more cognitively comfortable...

Note that for true approval voting, the 0-1 should actually be displayed as blank vs checked, and no-opinion wouldn't be an option (it would be the same as blank). Whereas...

Btw, I should have mentioned that the multi-winner election situation should offer [Reweighted Range Voting](http://rangevoting.org/RRV.html) which is basically STV-style of multi-winner applied to score voting. Incidentally, Score Runoff per http://www.equal.vote...

In recent discussions among voting reform people, I've come to the thinking that STV is not as flawed as IRV (and furthermore that despite Arrow's theorem applying, Ranked Pairs works...