Wojtek

I'd argue, that having explicit *mention* prefix makes sense and expresses definite intention. Have you considered asking developers of your client adding support for notifying on mentions in both forms?

Current situation is is not ideal and it seems that the best way forward would be to implement [XEP-0372: References: Mentions](https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0372.html#usecase_mention) and while we consider it there is no ETA.

Great that it works in other applications. Though, it's never been specified so that's customary at best. Morover, it can lead to excessive notification when we namedrop someone without intention...

Copy-paste from XSF muc: > @eevvoor we are not specifically against (where did you get that from) but we simply won't drop just like that because there are other factors...

Well, it seems that except xmpp-ecosystem everyone is on board with `@`-mentions ;-) It's simply quite convenient and intuitive to users.

Let's see, from the top of my head I know that: **github**, twitter, mastodon, facebook, slack, whatsapp, MS teams, mattermost and telegram uses `@` as mention. The issue at hand...

@Neustradamus have you considered submitting bug ('it does not work')/feature request to Psi developers though?

Are there any other errors in the logs? especially regarding initialisation of the data source? Please share complete log and configuration file.

> On a Tigase MUC Room, when we look the user information, we obtain: What exactly do you mean "look for user information"? What stanza do you send? Are you...

Thank you for the details. It would he helpful to include information which members were affected but even without that we can assume this is caused by literal implementation of...