Santiago Fraire Willemoes

Glad you liked it flekkowich! We'll see how to include more info about it. Our original idea was to keep it simple. But if this is useful for the users...

I mentioned the link to the setup because I couldn't find which command to run in the docs. For a beginner it's not clear which flake command would modify the...

I had not seen this, thanks! I was thinking maybe we can restructure the content in a more concise way (I can submit a PR if desired): ```md ## Installation...

I've cloned the repo and submodules with: ```sh git submodule update --init --recursive ``` but I don't understand, shouldn't I send a PR to nixos-flake instead?

Needs more information and examples. I don't understand what have you tried to do

But what did you already do? Can you share the toml that didn't work? This is a very common case and it's documented here: https://commitizen-tools.github.io/commitizen/customization/#1-customize-in-configuration-file ``` commit_parser = "^(?Pfeature|bug fix):\\s(?P.*)?"...

I think we should continue with this. It makes sense to allow the modification of an existing provider. Right @Lee-W @noirbizarre ?

Maybe instead of breaking `tool.commitizen.customize` we could create a new one: `tool.commitizen.rules`. Which would override the existing commitizen definition: ``` [tool.commitizen.rules] commit_parser = "^((?Pfeat|fix|refactor|perf|docs|style|refactor|ci|BREAKING CHANGE)(?:\\((?P[^()\r\n]*)\\)|\\()?(?P!)?|\\w+!):\\s(?P.*)?" changelog_pattern = "^((BREAKING[\\-\\ ]CHANGE|\\w+)(\\(.+\\))?!?):" change_type_map...

Wanna add it to the third party section in the docs? https://commitizen-tools.github.io/commitizen/third-party-commitizen/

Can you share the full action?